新聞 · 約 21 分鐘閱讀

社媒算法操縱新加坡選舉?內政部重拳出擊已封禁100多個帳號和網站

2025/03/25
直接閱讀正文 ↓

These problems can affect Members of Parliament (MPs), parties and candidates on all sides, of all persuasions.

So, given this, can the Minister of State share how Singapore and Singaporeans can better protect ourselves and our democracy, so that foreign social media companies do not have a situation where they manipulate algorithms to affect the outcome of our democratic process, so that politics in Singapore remains for Singaporeans to decide?

Ms Sun Xueling: I thank the Member for his supplementary questions. He has obviously given the matter much thought. I would like to come back to my main response, where I mentioned that the Government is aware that social media platforms' algorithms may potentially be manipulated to skew the consumption of information and that if algorithms are deliberately manipulated by foreign persons or entities, including social media companies, to affect our domestic politics, that will constitute foreign interference.

These two paragraphs that I have just shared do not rely on the information being falsehoods. What instead FICA is interested in is that there are activities conducted by foreign actors typically through covert or deceptive means that affect our domestic politics, in order to advance the foreign actors' own interests.

I would like to share an example. In 2024, the Government had issued FICA account restriction directions against a network of 95 social media accounts and also blocked 10 inauthentic websites that could potentially be used to mount hostile information campaigns against Singapore.

Beyond this, the Government also has in place several initiatives to help Singaporeans improve their information literacy skills.

We will continue to study the evolving online landscape and review if additional regulations for social media services are needed as part of ongoing efforts to enhance online safety in Singapore and strengthen our defences against foreign interference.

Mr Speaker: Mr Pritam Singh.

Mr Pritam Singh (Aljunied): Can I ask, Mr Speaker, how will the Ministry independently ascertain whether algorithms have been manipulated for the reasons that are put in the Parliamentary Question?

Ms Sun Xueling: I thank the Member his supplementary question. In and of itself, algorithms are not illegal. Many social media companies have algorithms for the purposes of pushing out their information.

They may use it because, first and foremost, the algorithms are proprietary and they use the algorithms because they want to be able to catch the eyeballs of consumers.

So, I would just like to make this point that algorithms, in and of itself, used by social media companies are not illegal. But what the FICA aims to do is that if the Minister is satisfied that the algorithms are being used by foreign entities, with a political end in mind, to influence domestic politics in Singapore, then he is empowered to issue pre-emptive measures.

Mr Speaker: Dr Tan Wu Meng.

Dr Tan Wu Meng: Mr Speaker, following on from the questions raised by both myself and the Leader of the Opposition, can I ask the Minister of State, would MHA be open to engaging with academia and researchers who conduct research into such matters? Can I perhaps draw the Minister of State's attention to how there is open source research by an Australian academic team – one at Queensland University of Technology, another at Monash University – which did a computational analysis of potential algorithmic bias on a major social media platform during a major election in another country, around the world, that happened quite recently, and that there are opportunities for academia to look at this, and can the Ministry, perhaps, look at examining collaborations with academia and experts, to study this further?

Ms Sun Xueling: I thank the Member for his suggestion. Indeed, the Government is open to conversations and engagements, because this is an evolving threat landscape and we would desire to hear from academics, as well as social media companies, as to the trends they are seeing.

I would like to cite two examples that have happened and which we can also take reference from, which is that there was British Broadcasting Corporation study, which claimed that young voters in key electoral constituencies during the 2024 United Kingdom elections have been recommended false and satirical artificial intelligence generated videos depicting party leaders making comments that they actually did not make.

And also, in recent years, there have also been allegations of foreign interference in elections through social media platforms, most notably during the 2024 United States (US) elections, where it was alleged that a social media bot farm, comprising over 900 social media accounts, had spread disinformation in the US and abroad.

So, indeed, I think there are examples in the real world and my Ministry will be open to these engagements to understand further as to what other steps can be taken.

CF丨翻譯

Alex丨編審

新加坡國會丨來源/圖源

上一頁
2/2

及時獲取本站更新:

設為 Google 偏好來源

繼續閱讀

社會

絕不姑息!新加坡出手整治印尼7家縱火公司,跨境煙霾必須停止!

社會

新加坡出手相助卻被冷處理?面對嚴重霾害,政府警告將起訴涉事公司!

社會

新加坡出手了!7家印尼公司被點名,因引發霾害面臨巨額罰款!

社會

絕不姑息!黃循財總理表態:將徹查引發霾害的責任公司,必要時直接起訴!

新聞

AI詐騙防不勝防!新加坡再投3000萬,加強網絡安全!

新聞

煙霾來襲| 新加坡調查印尼林火涉事企業 必要時援引法令採取行動

新聞

新加坡芽籠突擊行動!21名女性涉嫌賣淫被逮捕,面臨坐牢和罰款!

社會

臥室被裝監控!新加坡女傭發帖求助:僱主這樣做合法嗎?網友怒批侵犯隱私!

新聞

AI拒了你的貸款,找誰說理?新加坡把答案釘到了董事會

社會

政府下場幫公務員脫單?新加坡推出相親試點:隱藏照片、用代號匹配,主打一個「靈魂契合」!

新聞

涉為跨國詐騙團隊洗錢 2大馬人涉當錢騾落網被控

新聞

遭遊說花上萬元購美容配套 女子批騙局構成誹謗賠1.5萬

社會

新加坡霧霾太嚴重?博主分享神級「脫困」方案:直接把國家划走!

新聞

黃循財用榴槤回應大國競爭:新加坡渾身是刺

新聞

黃循財:海外衝突絕不能在新加坡造成分裂

新聞

「政府給的錢沒了」 七旬叔遇詐騙 痛失多年積蓄

新聞

新加坡PM2.5飆到288!燒焦味瀰漫全島,窗外只剩白茫茫一片!煙霾已蔓延至7國

新聞

婚變女外遇 私密照遭傳夫 男子監13個月

社會

緊急通知!新加坡霧霾嚴重升級,所有ActiveSG戶外場館全部關閉!

新聞

企圖走私逾700條漏稅煙 32歲大馬男獅城關卡被捕

新聞

為什麼新加坡是外匯自由國家?深度解析新加坡外匯管理政策

新聞

窩藏沒準證印尼女傭 新加坡男監8個月

新聞

全島PSI全線破百!新加坡煙霾捲土重來,雷雨救場恐難斷根

生活

升級版新加坡電子入境卡填寫指南